﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>alampi's Xanga</title><link>http://alampi.xanga.com/</link><description>Latest Xanga weblog from alampi</description><language>en-US</language><ttl>60</ttl><item><title>Differential Diagnosis of the Soul</title><link>http://alampi.xanga.com/716173211/differential-diagnosis-of-the-soul/</link><guid>http://alampi.xanga.com/716173211/differential-diagnosis-of-the-soul/</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:42:24 GMT</pubDate><description>Know any good doctor jokes?  Here are a few of my favorites:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Doctor: I have some bad news and some very bad news.&lt;br /&gt;Patient: Well, might as well give me the bad news first.&lt;br /&gt;Doctor: The lab called with your test results. They said you have 24 hours to live.&lt;br /&gt;Patient: 24 HOURS! That's terrible! WHAT could be WORSE? What's the very bad news?&lt;br /&gt;Doctor: I've been trying to reach you since yesterday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Doctor: "I've got very bad news. You've got cancer and Alzheimer's."&lt;br /&gt;Patient: "Well, at least I don't have cancer."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think deep down we all have a side to us that imagines being a doctor.  Think about it&amp;#8230;as soon as most people feel out of sorts, they cruise to WebMD.com or Google their symptoms before they schedule an appointment. And don&amp;#8217;t we love to try to assess and diagnose our friends when they are ill:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Friend: *cough* *cough*&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Me: Uh oh, sounds like that could be Swine Flu, or more accurately, the H1N1 virus. Or, maybe you have a rare disease called sarcoidosis.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Friend: What, are you a doctor now?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Me: No, but I watch House, so that&amp;#8217;s pretty much the same.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Have you seen House? It&amp;#8217;s the critically acclaimed series about an insolent, cynical genius who nails diagnoses like an expert investigator.  Sort of a medical CSI meets Sherlock Holmes.  Week after week, viewers get to pit their mad internet knowledge against House and watch him unravel the seemingly impossible medical mystery at hand.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;House&amp;#8217;s ill-mannered character got me thinking about another type of disease, one that is spiritual, not physical. And to many, it&amp;#8217;s the biggest mystery of all.  The symptoms are loneliness, depression, feelings of worthlessness, and broken relationships.  People who suffer from this condition &amp;#8220;will love only themselves and their money. They will be boastful and proud, scoffing at God, disobedient to their parents, and ungrateful. They will consider nothing sacred.  They will be unloving and unforgiving; they will slander others and have no self-control. They will be cruel and hate what is good.  They will betray their friends, be reckless, be puffed up with pride, and love pleasure rather than God&amp;#8221; (2 Timothy 3:2-4).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Wait, is that a description of House himself? It seems that the diagnosis for the worst disease ever has evaded even the most brilliant doctor. The mystery of this spiritual disease is due to the misdiagnoses and incorrect treatment it&amp;#8217;s been given over the years.  For centuries, supposed spiritual &amp;#8220;experts&amp;#8221; have put the blame on poor parenting, bad environments, and chemical imbalances, so the treatment must be therapy and drugs (vicodin anyone?).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But that&amp;#8217;s about as effective as House deciding to put a Band-aid on a massive tumor. The heart of the problem lies below the surface, in the heart of House&amp;#8230;and you&amp;#8230;and me&amp;#8230;and everyone on the planet. It doesn&amp;#8217;t show up on a PET scan or MRI. The Bible says it looks like this:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Medical Diagnosis &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;--------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Fallen World Syndrome&lt;br /&gt;100% FATAL!!!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;--------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Test results:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For all have sinned; all fall short of God's glorious standard (Romans 3:23). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No one is righteous&amp;#8212;not even one. No one is truly wise; no one is seeking God.&lt;br /&gt; All have turned away; all have become useless. No one does good, not a single one (Romans 3:10-12). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life through Christ Jesus our Lord (Romans 6:23). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If we say we have no sin, we are only fooling ourselves and refusing to accept the truth (I John 1:8). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This deadly killer not only debilitates and destroys your life on earth; it has eternal consequences as well&amp;#8212;separation from God for all eternity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But there is great news!  The true and permanent cure for our condition is available, and it&amp;#8217;s actually a simple process: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Treatment &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. As in most illnesses, the first step towards recovery is to recognize the reality of your condition. You have said wrong things, done wrong things, and thought wrong things, and because of that, you are separated from a perfect and Holy God. (Dear God, I admit I am a sinner...) &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. Acknowledge that your current condition is fatal. (Father, without Your forgiveness, I have no hope in this life or the life to come.) &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. Acknowledge that only the Great Physician's treatment is curative. (I believe Jesus&amp;#8217; death on the cross on my behalf is the only way to receive Your forgiveness.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4. Take your medicine. (Father, I accept what Jesus did on my behalf...I trust in Him as my only hope of salvation.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you&amp;#8217;ve been cured, you&amp;#8217;ll know what I&amp;#8217;m talking about. It&amp;#8217;s like coming out of a dark and cold tunnel into a beautiful sunlit paradise where the air is clear and you sense an overwhelming feeling of love and forgiveness.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you&amp;#8217;ve trusted Christ, congratulations! In a spiritual sense, you are now a doctor&amp;#8212;an even better one than House. You know the spiritual disease everyone has and what terrible consequences it carries&amp;#8230;so what are you waiting for, doc? Get out there and tell people about the cure, before the disease of sin wreaks more and more havoc on the ones you love!&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Dare 2 Share Ministries</description><comments>http://alampi.xanga.com/716173211/differential-diagnosis-of-the-soul/#firstcomment</comments></item><item><title>2010: Year of the Third Party</title><link>http://alampi.xanga.com/715941231/2010-year-of-the-third-party/</link><guid>http://alampi.xanga.com/715941231/2010-year-of-the-third-party/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:56:25 GMT</pubDate><description>Written by Linda Schrock Taylor   &lt;br /&gt;Wednesday, 04 November 2009&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Yesterday, Doug Hoffman set the stage and turned the tide with his race for NY-23.  Naysayers--Democrats and Republicans alike--will argue the point saying, &amp;#8220;But he lost!&amp;#8221;  YEAH-sayers will wisely counter with, &amp;#8220;But he almost won!&amp;#8221;  Hoffman&amp;#8217;s run should serve as a green light for third parties; as a call to Everyman.  America needs honest candidates with strong ethical principles, and in 2010 HONOR will have its best chance to make a comeback.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Remember typing class from way back when? &amp;#8220;Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.&amp;#8221;  The time is certainly now.  If Americans will accept the challenge of reclaiming America; of putting it back on its Founding Principles, then this coming year--November 2009 through November 2010--will become the Year of the Constitution, as well as the Year of the Third Party.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks to Doug Hoffman, citizens now have proof that one person can make a difference; can see the opportunity to save America.  I encourage everyone to leave your disappointing alliances with Tweedle-Dem and Tweedle-Pub, and join an honorable third party.  Get involved; run for offices at every level; campaign with Tea Party vigor, intent, and confidence.  Third parties can only offer strong and viable candidates when good people join them and work together to achieve goals.  If saving America and reinstating its fine constitution are not worthy goals, then nothing much matters anymore.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;For far too long we have let the Career Political Class handle the business of the nation while we worked at our jobs; paid too many taxes; often spent too much money; and generally clocked too many hours in front of our televisions.  Speaking of television, I laughed out loud when I saw the ridiculous clip of Obama demonstrating how he could mop up the mess if only people like you and me would get out of the way.  As usual, I responded aloud, &amp;#8220;Sorry, Barry, but you have no idea how to accomplish such a task.  Hercules, you are not.&amp;#8221;  An outsider lacks the insights; the commitment; the fixer know-how&amp;#8230;the ethics needed to re-found this country.  It is time that regular citizens turn our attention and energy to following the upright Mr. Smith to Washington.  Now Doug Hoffman has demonstrated the way for average citizens to get to Washington.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Progressives have brought America to the brink of destruction with their unconscionable bullying and the never-ending demands of Fabian Socialism. I feel certain that I speak for most of the American people when I say that it is our Right and our Responsibility to leave a constitutional; debt-free; limited government to our children and grandchildren.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We remember the lessons taught in our civics and government classes.  We know that America is a &amp;#8220;representative republic&amp;#8221; rather than a democracy.  Third party candidates should run against every congresscritter (my thanks to Claire Wolfe) who has ignored the wishes of the people to vote special interests or party agendas.  The time has come to oust any and all Democrats and Republicans who have misused their office and failed to honorably and consistently serve as a representative for their constituents.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Remember &amp;#8217;08 in October?  By the millions we repeatedly phoned and wrote to our elected representatives saying &amp;#8220;Vote &amp;#8216;NO&amp;#8217; on the bank bailouts.&amp;#8221;  One commentator reported that the calls to elected representatives were &amp;#8220;running about 50/50.  Fifty percent are saying &amp;#8216;NO!&amp;#8217; and the other fifty percent are saying &amp;#8216;HELL, NO!&amp;#8217;&amp;#8221;  Congress ignored us and voted to bailout the banks.  Should fatigue or discouragement slow your efforts or diminish your commitment&amp;#8230;Remember &amp;#8217;08 in October, and remember the courage and determination of Doug Hoffman.  Let us keep our power within our states and replace those two parties that are joined at the lip.</description><comments>http://alampi.xanga.com/715941231/2010-year-of-the-third-party/#firstcomment</comments></item><item><title>Economic Stimulus</title><link>http://alampi.xanga.com/715860936/economic-stimulus/</link><guid>http://alampi.xanga.com/715860936/economic-stimulus/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:32:35 GMT</pubDate><description>Q. What is an Economic Stimulus payment? &lt;br /&gt;A. It is money that the federal government will send to taxpayers. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Q. Where will the government get this money? &lt;br /&gt;A. From taxpayers. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Q. So the government is giving me back my own money? &lt;br /&gt;A. Only a smidge. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Q. What is the purpose of this payment? &lt;br /&gt;A. The plan is for you to use the money to purchase a high-definition TV set, thus stimulating the economy. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Q. But isn't that stimulating the economy of China? &lt;br /&gt;A. Shut up. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Below is some helpful advice on how to best help the US economy by spending your stimulus check wisely: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#8226; If you spend the stimulus money at Wal-Mart, the money will go to China. &lt;br /&gt;&amp;#8226; If you spend it on gasoline, your money will go to the Arabs &lt;br /&gt;&amp;#8226; If you purchase a computer, it will go to India. &lt;br /&gt;&amp;#8226; If you purchase fruit and vegetables, it will go to Mexico, Honduras and Guatemala. &lt;br /&gt;&amp;#8226; If you buy a car, it will go to Japan or Korea. &lt;br /&gt;&amp;#8226; If you purchase useless stuff, it will go to Taiwan. &lt;br /&gt;&amp;#8226; If you pay your credit cards off, or buy stock, it will go to management bonuses and they will hide it offshore. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Instead, keep the money in America by: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. spending it at yard sales, or &lt;br /&gt;2. going to ball games, or &lt;br /&gt;3. spending it on prostitutes, or &lt;br /&gt;4. beer or &lt;br /&gt;5. tattoos &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(these are the only American businesses still operating in the US)</description><comments>http://alampi.xanga.com/715860936/economic-stimulus/#firstcomment</comments></item><item><title>Choosing Federalism, Choosing Freedom</title><link>http://alampi.xanga.com/715810805/choosing-federalism-choosing-freedom/</link><guid>http://alampi.xanga.com/715810805/choosing-federalism-choosing-freedom/</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:32:38 GMT</pubDate><description>By Chuck Baldwin's Son, Tim Baldwin&lt;br /&gt;November 3, 2009&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;[Note: My son, Tim, writes today's column. He is an attorney who received&lt;br /&gt;his Juris Doctor degree from Cumberland School of Law at Samford University&lt;br /&gt;in Birmingham, Alabama. He is a former felony prosecutor for the Florida&lt;br /&gt;State Attorney's Office and now owns his own private law practice. He is the&lt;br /&gt;author of a soon-to-be-published new book, entitled FREEDOM FOR A CHANGE.&lt;br /&gt;Tim is also regarded as one of America's leading spokesmen for State&lt;br /&gt;sovereignty.]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After the release of my last column  "Freedom's Destruction by&lt;br /&gt;Constitutional De-Construction," I received so many responses to my&lt;br /&gt;statement, "The people of the states once again reject this national&lt;br /&gt;form of government and assert and defend the principles of federalism," that&lt;br /&gt;I felt the need to develop this subject more thoroughly. The question I&lt;br /&gt;received was: "How can I choose federalism once again?" Indeed, answering&lt;br /&gt;this question is crucial to injecting a cure for the sickness and illness of&lt;br /&gt;tyrannical, national control over the people of the states. Undoubtedly, we&lt;br /&gt;are going to need an acute dosage to even begin ridding ourselves of the&lt;br /&gt;disease destroying the body of our once-great federation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The reality is, the answer is not complicated. The more relevant question&lt;br /&gt;will likely be, what portion of the cure(s) must we implement. This will&lt;br /&gt;require a diagnosis of the degree and seriousness of the disease's attack on&lt;br /&gt;our Confederate Republic. Let us analyze briefly the seriousness of the&lt;br /&gt;attack so that we may proportionally and accordingly respond and defend&lt;br /&gt;against the encroachments on our constitutional freedoms, guarantees and&lt;br /&gt;powers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Keeping in line with my last article and the position that the national&lt;br /&gt;system of government (under which the United States currently operates) is&lt;br /&gt;completely contrary to the federal system that our founders and&lt;br /&gt;Constitution's ratifiers bequeathed to us, a fact is established: We the&lt;br /&gt;People of the United States of America have been denied our natural and&lt;br /&gt;compactual rights under God and the Constitution. Again, how can it be&lt;br /&gt;argued that it is now legally and morally right and proper to do what our&lt;br /&gt;Constitution did not create or authorize? How can freedom exist in a country&lt;br /&gt;where we supposedly believe in the "consent of the governed" when that&lt;br /&gt;consent has been usurped by force? Consequently, our right of defense is&lt;br /&gt;activated.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Make no mistake about this: the US Constitution did NOT create a national&lt;br /&gt;government, but rather created a federal government whereby the states were&lt;br /&gt;coequal with the federal government in the exercise and defense of the&lt;br /&gt;powers granted to them by the people of each State. The founders and&lt;br /&gt;ratifiers of the Constitution expressly rejected the notion that the federal&lt;br /&gt;government has supreme sovereignty. The issue here is not whether there are&lt;br /&gt;"national components" of the procedures in the system, such as voting for&lt;br /&gt;the House of Representatives by the people. We know that the founders&lt;br /&gt;implemented a few elements of national-type procedure in the US&lt;br /&gt;Constitution, just as they did even in the Articles of Confederation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rather, the bottom-line issue is, whether the states have coequal power to&lt;br /&gt;exercise and defend their powers--and their citizens--and whether the&lt;br /&gt;Federal government has the power to force the states to accept its own&lt;br /&gt;interpretation and (de)construction of the Constitution. If the union of the&lt;br /&gt;United States was formed by the people of the states in their capacities as&lt;br /&gt;the sovereign of each State, creating a FEDERAL government, then the states&lt;br /&gt;are coequal in power and do have the right to exercise and defend their&lt;br /&gt;powers. If the union of the United States was formed by the whole of the&lt;br /&gt;people as a mass body politic, without regard to the sovereign states,&lt;br /&gt;creating a NATIONAL government, then the states are mere corporations of the&lt;br /&gt;parent company, called the Federal government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I need not expound the answer to this question here, because I have done so&lt;br /&gt;in numerous other articles before, proving that the union was formed by the&lt;br /&gt;states as states, and not by the people as one nation. The conclusion is&lt;br /&gt;more than provable that the founders and ratifiers of the Constitution did&lt;br /&gt;not create a nation, but created a federation, and actually expected the&lt;br /&gt;states to be the active guardians of freedom for their own people. Thus,&lt;br /&gt;what methods can we use today to once again choose federalism over&lt;br /&gt;nationalism?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There are five basic methods by which the people of the states can counter&lt;br /&gt;the attacks of the federal government's prolonged tyrannical usurpations of&lt;br /&gt;power. They are: (1) Change of Politicians; (2) Checks and Balances; (3)&lt;br /&gt;Constitutional Amendment; (4) Constitutional Convention; and (5) Revolution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Change of Politicians. Alexander Hamilton notes in Federalist Paper 21,&lt;br /&gt;"The natural cure for an ill-administration, in a popular or representative&lt;br /&gt;constitution, is a change of men." This method of cure is no mystery, and&lt;br /&gt;has been the mode of "change" in the US for the past 50 years. Dare I say,&lt;br /&gt;this method has proven to be anything but effectual?  Please show me how&lt;br /&gt;changing the Federal government from Republican to Democrat and vice versa&lt;br /&gt;has done ANYTHING to reinstitute our federal form of government, provided by&lt;br /&gt;the Constitution. Both parties in the federal government do absolutely&lt;br /&gt;nothing to revert rightful power to the people of the states. I shall not&lt;br /&gt;waste any more valuable time or words on this ineffectual method. (Then&lt;br /&gt;again, if we had a majority of congressmen such as Ron Paul in Washington,&lt;br /&gt;D.C., we wouldn't be having this discussion to begin with.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. Checks and Balances. There are two types of checks and balances: (a)&lt;br /&gt;federal against federal, and (b) State against federal. Since the early&lt;br /&gt;1900s, the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the federal&lt;br /&gt;government have usurped power from the states. To say that the people of the&lt;br /&gt;states can count on the three branches of the federal government to check&lt;br /&gt;each other in this regard and to maintain a Federal form of government is a&lt;br /&gt;joke. All three branches maintain that they possess the sole power (through&lt;br /&gt;the judiciary) to interpret and construe the Constitution, and that all&lt;br /&gt;others (i.e., the states) must submit thereto. This is in fact the very&lt;br /&gt;definition of nationalism, which the Constitution's ratifiers rejected.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for the states' check against federal usurpations of power, most ignorant&lt;br /&gt;or disillusioned people would say that they lost that right when the&lt;br /&gt;Confederate States of America lost the Civil War in 1865, and from that&lt;br /&gt;point onward, the states could not check the federal government through&lt;br /&gt;arresting action. They suggest that to conquer equals the right to rule: a&lt;br /&gt;notion completely rejected in American jurisprudence. Time does not allow me&lt;br /&gt;to expand on this erroneous doctrine, so I will simply say, How ludicrous!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fact is, the Federalist Paper writers expected the states to be the&lt;br /&gt;guardians against federal tyranny. This necessarily meant (as they&lt;br /&gt;expressed) that the states develop actual arms of resistance to such&lt;br /&gt;encroachments. This, of course, shows, once again, the FEDERAL character and&lt;br /&gt;nature of our form of government: the states were not subservient to the&lt;br /&gt;federal government's dictates, but were coequal in power to protect their&lt;br /&gt;own authority and freedoms through their State Constitutions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thankfully, we are seeing a current resurgence of State activism to be the&lt;br /&gt;voice and arm of the people to protect and perpetuate the US Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;While the federal v. federal checks and balances have proven to be less than&lt;br /&gt;fruitful, the states today are taking their role more seriously in this&lt;br /&gt;regard, just as our founders and ratifiers demanded. It is this State power&lt;br /&gt;of active and passive nullification and resistance that will once again&lt;br /&gt;protect federalism and freedom in America. Therefore, it is this State power&lt;br /&gt;that affords us the best opportunity to defend liberty and restore&lt;br /&gt;constitutional government, and that we should expend most our energies to&lt;br /&gt;revive.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. Constitutional Amendment. The US Constitution requires three-fourths of&lt;br /&gt;the STATES to amend the Constitution. Most certainly this is an effective&lt;br /&gt;tool to reverse and prevent evils in government. Our founders expected that&lt;br /&gt;this process would protect freedom and the principles of freedom. However,&lt;br /&gt;as we have seen since 1865, the amendment process has been used only to&lt;br /&gt;increase national power and decrease State power. From the states being&lt;br /&gt;denied power in the Senate, to the income tax and "privileges and&lt;br /&gt;immunities" clause of the fourteenth amendment, the nationalists of the&lt;br /&gt;twentieth century have had their heyday by deepening their squeeze of&lt;br /&gt;national ideals over federal. Ironically, the attack on federalism has come&lt;br /&gt;through the same document protecting our federation: the Constitution. (The&lt;br /&gt;illegality of amendments being used to propagate principles contrary to&lt;br /&gt;freedom and federalism is for another article and discussion.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That being said: if there were enough states to amend the Constitution to&lt;br /&gt;clarify federal doctrines, limit federal government power, and reinstitute&lt;br /&gt;original State powers, then it most certainly would be beneficial. Praise&lt;br /&gt;the day when such amendments would be ratified.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4. Constitutional Convention. I have heard this method suggested by some in&lt;br /&gt;certain circles of the "patriot movement," and while I understand the&lt;br /&gt;suggestion of calling a constitutional convention to rewrite the&lt;br /&gt;Constitution, I believe that to do so would likely create more problems than&lt;br /&gt;what we are dealing with today. However, there is a caveat, as explained&lt;br /&gt;below.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To convene a constitutional convention, states would have to send delegates&lt;br /&gt;(just as in 1787) for the purpose of discussing and drafting a Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;Not even getting into the legal issues and ramifications inherent in such a&lt;br /&gt;method, a very practical question is raised: Would a majority of the people&lt;br /&gt;convening at such a monumental event even possess the understanding,&lt;br /&gt;knowledge and belief needed to perpetuate and protect the principles of&lt;br /&gt;freedom and federalism? By virtue of what I see throughout the US today, I&lt;br /&gt;venture to say, No. I believe one of the greatest contributions to national&lt;br /&gt;ideals defeating federal ideals is that the people (including on State&lt;br /&gt;levels) do not understand, know or believe in the principles expressed by&lt;br /&gt;our founders and their forefathers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thus, to call a constitutional convention would most certainly place us in a&lt;br /&gt;worse situation. That said, there is one positive that could result from&lt;br /&gt;this. If the Constitution were re-written, it would require the ratification&lt;br /&gt;of the states that wanted to join a new union under a new contract&lt;br /&gt;(Constitution). In this case, it very well may provide a way for the people&lt;br /&gt;of the states to decide which path they wanted to take: national or federal.&lt;br /&gt;In other words, those states that yet wanted to live under Federalism and&lt;br /&gt;not Nationalism could reject the new compact and could declare themselves&lt;br /&gt;independent or seek to form yet another compact among like-minded states.&lt;br /&gt;(Of course, this could happen anyway, per number 2 above--even without a&lt;br /&gt;constitutional convention--making any proposed Con Con a dangerous and&lt;br /&gt;unnecessary action.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;5. Revolution. Revolution simply means a change of power. For those who&lt;br /&gt;perceive such a term as being a bad thing, why do they not then demonize the&lt;br /&gt;current illegitimate system of national government, because this current&lt;br /&gt;system is not the one the states ratified back in 1787? If a squatter turns&lt;br /&gt;your property into his, are you not within your rights to remove him, his&lt;br /&gt;family, his friends and his belongings completely from your property?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is a fact that Americans (nationalists, federalists and even monarchists)&lt;br /&gt;believed in the natural right of revolution--that every generation has the&lt;br /&gt;God-given right to effect change by revolution when change cannot be&lt;br /&gt;reasonably expected and effected through other more peaceful means.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Coming full circle, then: To what degree has the federal government usurped&lt;br /&gt;its powers? This question is crucial because, as our forefathers expressed,&lt;br /&gt;resistance should be enacted proportionally to the usurpation. While there&lt;br /&gt;may be some who think that "it's not all that bad," I suggest that it is&lt;br /&gt;much worse than we think it is. We are at a point today when we are not only&lt;br /&gt;fighting for State sovereignty and a federal system, but we are fighting for&lt;br /&gt;national sovereignty (according to the LAWS OF NATIONS as expressed by&lt;br /&gt;enlightenment philosophers and jurists), against those who desire that the&lt;br /&gt;US become part of the global community.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The evidence around us is beyond reasonable doubt: we the people of the&lt;br /&gt;United States have been fraudulently denied our rights under the laws of&lt;br /&gt;Nature and Nature's God, and under the US Constitution. The rights to resist&lt;br /&gt;this tyranny already exist. The methods to choose federalism and freedom&lt;br /&gt;have their hands out, offering to help us. It is time we choose which method&lt;br /&gt;or methods will best reach the ultimate goal of freedom. And as I said, I&lt;br /&gt;believe a revival of State sovereignty--whereby states are resolved to&lt;br /&gt;exercise the authority they have per the terms of their charter&lt;br /&gt;(Constitution)--is the most attractive and effective method currently&lt;br /&gt;feasible to reclaim federalism and freedom in America.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Note: Visit Tim's web site at:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;www.libertydefenseleague.com</description><comments>http://alampi.xanga.com/715810805/choosing-federalism-choosing-freedom/#firstcomment</comments></item><item><title>The Ultimate FlashForward</title><link>http://alampi.xanga.com/715745681/the-ultimate-flashforward/</link><guid>http://alampi.xanga.com/715745681/the-ultimate-flashforward/</guid><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:07:48 GMT</pubDate><description>Imagine 6 billion people blacking out simultaneously for 137 seconds and catching a glimpse of their lives 6 months into the future.  That&amp;#8217;s an awesome concept for a television series. ABC thought so too, as evidenced by their show FlashForward.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#8217;m not sure I&amp;#8217;d really appreciate a glimpse into my future. How about you?  Given all the incredible changes that even a day can bring, a six-month life direction snapshot might push me into the land of obsessive/compulsive control freaks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then again, a &amp;#8220;flash forward&amp;#8221; may also be a reminder of the predictable and mundane aspects of life.  How the same old, same old might just be the same old stuff on a different day. In my case, I&amp;#8217;d probably catch a riveting scene of a hopeful and heavier me reading an article on NFL.com about how the luckless Oakland Raiders might win three or four games next year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What do you think you&amp;#8217;d witness? And even more importantly, what would you want to see?  You&amp;#8217;re finally dating that hottie or hunk that has given you butterflies since grade school?  Or maybe you&amp;#8217;re getting a report card that shows an effort and success you never expected or thought possible?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Not to alarm you - or maybe alarm you just a little - but there were real &amp;#8220;flash forward&amp;#8221; scenes revealed nearly 2,000 years ago. They were not fantasy drama scenarios dreamed up by a human mind. These, rather, were veritable pictures of the final destinations and destinies of all of humankind painted by the very hand of God.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Flash Forward #1 - God&amp;#8217;s Throne (Revelation 20:11-15)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And I saw a great white throne and the one sitting on it. The earth and sky fled from his presence, but they found no place to hide. I saw the dead, both great and small, standing before God&amp;#8217;s throne. And the books were opened, including the Book of Life. And the dead were judged according to what they had done, as recorded in the books. The sea gave up its dead, and death and the grave gave up their dead. And all were judged according to their deeds. Then death and the grave were thrown into the lake of fire. This lake of fire is the second death. And anyone whose name was not found recorded in the Book of Life was thrown into the lake of fire.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is the &amp;#8220;flash forward&amp;#8221; for all people who reject God&amp;#8217;s free offer of salvation by grace through faith in Jesus. Their ultimate end is one of eternal punishment. You can reject this &amp;#8220;flash forward&amp;#8221; simply because you don&amp;#8217;t like it, but that will not change the reality of that heartbreaking day.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Flash Forward #2 - The Judgment Seat of Christ (2 Corinthians 5:10; 1 Corinthians 3:13-15)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For we must all stand before Christ to be judged. We will each receive whatever we deserve for the good or evil we have done in this earthly body. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the judgment day, fire will reveal what kind of work each builder has done. The fire will show if a person&amp;#8217;s work has any value.  If the work survives, that builder will receive a reward.  But if the work is burned up, the builder will suffer great loss. The builder will be saved, but like someone barely escaping through a wall of flames.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is the destination for all people who accept God&amp;#8217;s free offer of salvation through Jesus Christ.  After we trust in Jesus for salvation, we are given an opportunity each day to grow closer in our relationship with Him through prayer and Bible study, and most importantly, through sharing the good news of salvation with those God puts in our path.  If we ignore those opportunities, we&amp;#8217;ll still get into heaven, but &amp;#8216;like someone barely escaping through a wall of flames&amp;#8217;&amp;#8230; In other words, the smell of smoke may be on our eternal clothes! ??? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Scary?  Yes&amp;#8230; Real? Most certainly.  But the good news is that you can start living in light of these &amp;#8220;flash forwards&amp;#8221; today. If you have not trusted in Jesus Christ as your only hope of salvation, do so right now! You do NOT want to be separated from God&amp;#8217;s presence for all eternity. If you have trusted Christ, but are living a &amp;#8220;On Sunday, I love Jesus, but Monday through Saturday, I party like a rock star&amp;#8221; kind of life, you should know that your eternal destiny will be characterized by remembering missed opportunities and regretting your lost rewards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here&amp;#8217;s a great six-month &amp;#8220;flash forward&amp;#8221; for you. Picture yourself starting the day with praise to God, asking for the power of the Spirit, and finally taking the step to share the gospel with your friends.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Or maybe you have an even better one?  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bottom line: God&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;flash forwards&amp;#8221; are set&amp;#8230;what are you going to do about them?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dare 2 Share Ministries</description><comments>http://alampi.xanga.com/715745681/the-ultimate-flashforward/#firstcomment</comments></item><item><title>Thursday, October 29, 2009</title><link>http://alampi.xanga.com/715487513/item/</link><guid>http://alampi.xanga.com/715487513/item/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:37:23 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;a href="http://www.nolanchart.com/article532.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Ron Paul's Lies, Non-Constitutional Votes and Tax Hikes.&lt;/a&gt;</description><comments>http://alampi.xanga.com/715487513/item/#firstcomment</comments></item><item><title>You Might Be A Constitutionalist If . . .</title><link>http://alampi.xanga.com/714901643/you-might-be-a-constitutionalist-if---/</link><guid>http://alampi.xanga.com/714901643/you-might-be-a-constitutionalist-if---/</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:27:27 GMT</pubDate><description>by Chuck Baldwin &lt;br /&gt;October 20, 2009 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;More than thirty years as a student of American history, constitutional government, and the Holy Bible leads me to the conviction that the two major political parties in this country (at the national level) are equally culpable in stripping America of its founding principles. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;In my opinion, both the Democrat and Republican parties in Washington, D.C., have zero fidelity to the U.S. Constitution and zero respect for America's foundational precepts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In my studied opinion, neither the Democrat nor Republican Party (at the national level) has any intention of slowing the out-of-control expansion of government. Neither party has demonstrated any loyalty to preserving and protecting our constitutional form of government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Like National Socialists and Soviet Socialists of old, the only thing that concerns Democrats and Republicans today is who is in power. Both are equally willing to destroy the freedoms and liberties of people without conscience or regret as long as their party remains in control.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am absolutely convinced that without a renewed allegiance to constitutional government and State sovereignty, there can be no resolution to America's current slide into socialism and oppression. Therefore, it is critical that we cast aside our infatuation with partisan politics and steadfastly stand firm for the principles of federalism and freedom, as did America's founders.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Might you be a modern-day Minuteman who understands the principles of freedom and federalism? I offer the following test. Read it and see if you, too, are a Constitutionalist. (Yes, Martha, this is another Jeff Foxworthy spin-off.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that every congressman, senator, President, and Supreme Court justice is required to obey the U.S. Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that before the United States invades and occupies another country, Congress must first declare war.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe the federal government should live within its means, like everyone else is forced to do.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4. You might be a Constitutionalist if you think that taking away people's liberties in the name of security is not patriotic, nor does it make the country more secure.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;5. You might be a Constitutionalist if you would like to see politicians be forced to abide by the same laws they make everyone else submit to.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;6. You might be a Constitutionalist if you understand that we have three "separate but equal" branches of government that are supposed to hold each other in check and balance.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;7. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that the federal government has no authority to be involved in education or law enforcement, or in any other issue that the Tenth Amendment reserves to the States, or to the People.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;8. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that gun control laws do nothing but aid and abet criminals while trampling the rights and freedoms of law-abiding citizens.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;9. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that the income tax is both unconstitutional and immoral, and, along with the I.R.S. and the Federal Reserve, should be abolished.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;10. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe the federal government had no authority to tell former Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore that he could not display a monument containing the Ten Commandments in the Alabama Judicial Building in Montgomery; or to tell a Pace, Florida, high school principal that he could not pray before a meal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;11. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that Congress or the White House or any sovereign State is not required to submit to unconstitutional Supreme Court rulings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;12. You might be a Constitutionalist if you understand that freedom has nothing in common with illegal immigration.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;13. You might be a Constitutionalist if you understand that outsourcing American jobs overseas is not good for America.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;14. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that the United States should get out of the United Nations and get the United Nations out of the United States.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;15. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that it is not unconstitutional for children in public schools to pray or read the Bible.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;16. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that the Boy Scouts are not a threat to America.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;17. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that the federal government should honor its commitments to America's veterans and stop using U.S. military personnel as guinea pigs for testing drugs and chemicals.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;18. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that U.S. troops should never serve under foreign commanders or wear the uniform or insignia of the United Nations, and that they must never submit to illegal orders, such as turning their weapons against American citizens, or confiscating the guns of U.S. citizens.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;19. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that the federal government has no business bribing churches and faith-based organizations with federal tax dollars.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;20. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that federal agents who murder American citizens should be held to the same laws and punishments that any other citizen would be held to. (Can anyone say, "Waco" and "Ruby Ridge"?)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;21. You might be a Constitutionalist if you understand that NAFTA, GATT, the WTO, and the FTAA (and similar agreements) are disastrous compromises of America's national sovereignty and independence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;22. You might be a Constitutionalist if you would like to see congressmen and senators be required to actually read a bill before passing it into law.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;23. You might be a Constitutionalist if you understand that it is the job of government to protect and secure God-given rights, not use its power to take those rights away.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;24. You might be a Constitutionalist if you understand that there is nothing unconstitutional about the public acknowledgement of God and our Christian heritage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;25. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that government bailouts and "stimulus" expenditures defy virtually every principle of free enterprise and are a flagrant leap into socialism.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;26. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that airport screeners have no business touching women's breasts, using sophisticated machinery to look through passengers' clothing to see their naked bodies, confiscating fingernail clippers, or denying pilots from carrying handguns.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;27. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that many public schools' "zero-tolerance" policies are just plain stupid.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;28. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that parents have a right to homeschool their children.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;29. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that governmental seizure of private property is plain, old-fashioned thievery.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;30. You might be a Constitutionalist if you are personally determined to not submit to any kind of forced vaccination.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;31. You might be a Constitutionalist if you oppose any kind of national health insurance.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;32. You might be a Constitutionalist if you believe that U.S. troops are not the world's policemen, that they are not "nation-builders," and that their purpose is only to defend American lives and property, not to be the enforcement arm of international commercial interests or global elitists.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;33. You might be a Constitutionalist if you understand that the county Sheriff is the highest law enforcement officer of his district and that federal law enforcement (much of which is unconstitutionally organized, anyway) is obligated to submit to his authority.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;34. You might be a Constitutionalist if you are determined to oppose America's merger with any kind of regional, hemispheric, or international government, such as the North American Union.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;35. You might be a Constitutionalist if you oppose sending billions of taxpayer dollars as foreign aid; the U.S. State Department meddling into the private affairs of foreign countries; and ubiquitous foreign entanglements that require vast sums of money, create animosity and hostility towards us, and expose us to foreign wars and conflicts in which we have no national interest.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;36. You might be a Constitutionalist if you would like to meet one single congressman or senator besides Ron Paul who acts as if he or she has ever read the U.S. Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Well, how did you fare? Are you a Constitutionalist? If so, your country desperately needs you to stand up and fight for freedom's principles before they are forever taken from us. This means never again voting for anyone--from any party--who will not preserve, protect, and defend the U.S. Constitution. So, don't just take the test; make the pledge!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Are YOU convinced now to join the &lt;a href="http://constitutionparty.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Constitution Party&lt;/a&gt;?</description><comments>http://alampi.xanga.com/714901643/you-might-be-a-constitutionalist-if---/#firstcomment</comments></item><item><title>THE GOVERNMENT HAS COME AND WANTS TO HELP YOU !!</title><link>http://alampi.xanga.com/714568419/the-government-has-come-and-wants-to-help-you-/</link><guid>http://alampi.xanga.com/714568419/the-government-has-come-and-wants-to-help-you-/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:39:15 GMT</pubDate><description>Once upon a time the government had a vast scrap yard in the middle of a desert. Congress said, "Someone may steal from it at night."  So they created a night watchman position and hired a person for the job.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then Congress said, "How does the watchman do his job without instruction?" So they created a planning department and hired two people, one person to write the instructions, and one person to do time studies.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then Congress said, "How will we know the night watchman is doing the tasks correctly?" So they created a Quality Control department and hired two people. One to do the studies and one to write the reports.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then Congress said, "How are these people going to get paid?" So they created the following positions, a time keeper, and a payroll officer, then hired two people.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then Congress said, "Who will be accountable for all of these people?"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So they created an administrative section and hired three people, an Administrative Officer, Assistant Administrative Officer, and a Legal Secretary.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then Congress said, "We have had this command in operation for one Year and we are $18,000 over budget, we must cutback overall cost."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So they laid off the night watchman.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NOW slowly..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Let it sink in.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Quietly, we go like sheep to slaughter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Does anybody remember the reason given for the establishment of the DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY .... During the Carter Administration?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anybody?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anything?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Didn't think so!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bottom line. We've spent several hundred billion dollars in support of an agency ... &lt;br /&gt;the reason for which not one person who reads this can remember!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ready?? &lt;br /&gt;It was very simple ... and at the time, everybody thought it very appropriate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Department of Energy was instituted on 8-04-1977.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;TO LESSEN OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN OIL.&lt;br /&gt;Hey, pretty efficient, huh???&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;AND NOW, IT'S 2009 -- 32 YEARS LATER -- AND THE BUDGET FOR THIS "NECESSARY" DEPARTMENT IS AT $24.2 BILLION A YEAR. THEY HAVE 16,000 FEDERAL EMPLOYEES AND APPROXIMATELY 100,000 CONTRACT EMPLOYEES; AND LOOK AT THE JOB THEY HAVE DONE! THIS IS WHERE YOU SLAP YOUR FOREHEAD AND SAY, "WHAT WAS I THINKING?"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ah, yes -- good ole bureaucracy.&lt;br /&gt;AND, NOW, WE ARE GOING TO TURN THE BANKING SYSTEM, HEALTH CARE AND THE AUTO INDUSTRY OVER TO THE SAME GOVERNMENT?</description><comments>http://alampi.xanga.com/714568419/the-government-has-come-and-wants-to-help-you-/#firstcomment</comments></item><item><title>The South - You Gotta Love It</title><link>http://alampi.xanga.com/714447810/the-south---you-gotta-love-it/</link><guid>http://alampi.xanga.com/714447810/the-south---you-gotta-love-it/</guid><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:34:14 GMT</pubDate><description>Alabama&lt;br /&gt;A group of Alabama friends went deer hunting and paired&lt;br /&gt;off in twos for the day. That night, one of the hunters returned alone,&lt;br /&gt;staggering under the weight of an eight-point buck. "Where's Henry?" the&lt;br /&gt;others asked.  "Henry had a stroke of some kind. He's a couple of miles&lt;br /&gt;back up the trail," the successful hunter replied.  "You left Henry&lt;br /&gt;laying out there and carried the deer back?" they inquired.  "A tough&lt;br /&gt;call," nodded the hunter. "But I figured no one is going  to steal&lt;br /&gt;Henry!"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Georgia&lt;br /&gt;The owner of a golf course in Georgia was confused about&lt;br /&gt;paying an invoice, so he decided to ask his secretary for some&lt;br /&gt;mathematical help.  He called her into his office and said, "You&lt;br /&gt;graduated from the University of Georgia and I need some help. If I were&lt;br /&gt;to give you $20,000, minus 14%, how much would you take off?"  The&lt;br /&gt;secretary thought a moment, and then replied, "Everything but my&lt;br /&gt;earrings"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Louisiana&lt;br /&gt;A senior at Louisiana was overheard saying ... "When the&lt;br /&gt;end of the world comes, I hope to be in Louisiana . "When asked why, he&lt;br /&gt;replied, "I 'd rather be in Louisiana because everything happens in&lt;br /&gt;Louisiana 20 years later  than in the rest of the civilized world."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mississippi&lt;br /&gt;The young man from Mississippi came running into the&lt;br /&gt;store and said to his buddy, "Bubba, somebody just stole your pickup&lt;br /&gt;truck from the parking lot!" Bubba replied, "Did you see who it was?"&lt;br /&gt;The young man answered, "I couldn't tell, but I got the license number."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;North Carolina&lt;br /&gt;NEWS FLASH! - North Carolina 's worst air disaster&lt;br /&gt;occurred! When a small two-seater Cessna 150 plane, piloted by two&lt;br /&gt;University of  North Carolina students, crashed into a cemetery earlier&lt;br /&gt;today. Search and Rescue workers have recovered 300 bodies so far and&lt;br /&gt;expect the number to climb as digging continues into the evening.  The&lt;br /&gt;pilot and copilot survived and are helping in the recovery efforts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tennessee&lt;br /&gt;A Tennessee State trooper pulled over a pickup on I-65.&lt;br /&gt;The trooper asked, "Got any ID?" The driver replied, "Bout whut?"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Texas&lt;br /&gt;The Sheriff pulled up next to the guy unloading garbage out of&lt;br /&gt;his pick-up into the ditch.&lt;br /&gt;The Sheriff asked, "Why are you dumping garbage in the ditch?&lt;br /&gt;Don't you see that sign right over your head." "Yep", he replied.&lt;br /&gt;"That's why I dumpin it here, cause it says: 'Fine&lt;br /&gt;For Dumping Garbage'."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You can say what you want about the South,&lt;br /&gt;But you never hear of anyone retiring and moving North.</description><comments>http://alampi.xanga.com/714447810/the-south---you-gotta-love-it/#firstcomment</comments></item><item><title>Important Women's Health Issue</title><link>http://alampi.xanga.com/714365660/important-womens-health-issue/</link><guid>http://alampi.xanga.com/714365660/important-womens-health-issue/</guid><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:38:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Helpful Friday Bulletin about an Important Women's Health Issue: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    *         Do you have feelings of inadequacy?   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    *         Do you suffer from shyness?   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    *          Do you sometimes wish you were more assertive?   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you answered yes to any of these questions, ask your doctor or pharmacist about Margaritas.   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Margaritas are the safe, natural way to feel better and more confident about yourself and your actions.  Margaritas can help ease you out of your shyness and let you tell the world that you're ready and willing to do just about anything.  You will notice the benefits of Margaritas almost immediately and with a regimen of regular doses you can overcome any obstacles that prevent you from living the life you want to live.  Shyness and awkwardness will be a thing of the past and you will discover many talents you never knew you had. Stop hiding and start living, with Margaritas.   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Margaritas may not be right for everyone. Women who are pregnant or nursing should not use Margaritas. However, women who wouldn't mind nursing or becoming pregnant are encouraged to try it.   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Side effects may include:   &lt;br /&gt;- Dizziness   &lt;br /&gt;- Nausea   &lt;br /&gt;- Vomiting   &lt;br /&gt;- Incarceration   &lt;br /&gt;- Erotic lustfulness   &lt;br /&gt;- Loss of motor control   &lt;br /&gt;- Loss of clothing   &lt;br /&gt;- Loss of money      &lt;br /&gt;- Table dancing   &lt;br /&gt;- Headache   &lt;br /&gt;- Dehydration   &lt;br /&gt;- Dry mouth   &lt;br /&gt;- And a desire to sing Karaoke   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;WARNINGS:  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    *         The consumption of Margaritas may make you think you are whispering when you are not.   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    *          The consumption of Margaritas may cause you to tell your friends over and over again that you love them.   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    *         The consumption of Margaritas may cause you to think you can sing.   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    *         The consumption of Margaritas may make you think you can logically converse with members of the         opposite sex without spitting.   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please share this with other women who may need Margaritas.</description><comments>http://alampi.xanga.com/714365660/important-womens-health-issue/#firstcomment</comments></item></channel></rss>